
Neutral Feedback for flukemanIf you would like to edit or delete feedback you've posted on flukeman, or if you are flukeman, you must be logged in. You can only edit or delete feedback if you're the poster, and you have just three days after posting to do so.
|
| Seller: RedsTradingPost (User Rating) | Rating: Neutral | When: 04/04/2005 at 09:41:22 |
| Auction: 6430925 |
| Comments: This person was the high bidder on my auction. He claimed that there were markings on the wood. This was manufactured in 1969 and was in excellent shape. He said I described it "like new" which is a term I never use. I refund the money however. |
| Rebuttal left by: flukeman | When: 04/11/2005 at 14:34:45 |
| Rebuttal: I never said there were markings on the wood. What I said was that quite a bit of the finish was missing from the forearm. The condition was listed as "Condition: NRA Excellent - Little to no wear" and that is cut and pasted from the ad! |
| Seller: larrysguns (User Rating) | Rating: Neutral | When: 03/08/2004 at 12:24:43 |
| Auction: 5493254 |
| Comments: Gun returned for a full refund. |
| Rebuttal left by: flukeman | When: 03/10/2004 at 15:22:54 |
| Rebuttal: Returned a beat up gun that was described as in "super shape". |
| Seller: wildphilcoyote (User Rating) | Rating: Neutral | When: 05/09/2003 at 15:29:09 |
| Auction: 4114612 |
| Comments: Gentleman returned firearm after it did not meet his expectations as is his right under the rules. Only leaving neutral to recoup listing fees. I would deal with him again. |
| Rebuttal left by: flukeman | When: 05/24/2003 at 04:56:57 |
| Rebuttal: Returned gun that was generally described as "like new" but had mold and some minor corrosion on it when I received it. The gun would've cleaned up nicely but I felt the description was a bit optimistic so I returned it. Cost me approx $30 in shipping fees. |
|
This user has received 3 Neutral feedback
.
|